Co-liberative Computing


Bell Hooks' Teaching to Transgress explores the transformative power of education and its role in challenging societal norms. She reflects on her own journey as a student and teacher, from experiencing education as a liberating force in all-Black schools to facing racism and conformity in predominantly white institutions. Hooks critiques traditional teaching methods, arguing that classrooms should be spaces of engagement, excitement, and resistance rather than control and oppression. Influenced by Paulo Freire's ideas on critical pedagogy, she advocates for an inclusive, participatory approach where students and teachers learn together. Ultimately, she sees education as a practice of freedom that encourages critical thinking, challenges authority, and fosters personal and collective growth.


Engaged Pedagogy

Bell Hooks argues that teaching should go beyond just sharing information; it should nurture both intellectual and personal growth. She believes education should be a practice of freedom, where students actively engage in learning rather than passively memorizing facts. Inspired by thinkers like Paulo Freire and Thich Nhat Hanh, she emphasizes the importance of critical thinking, personal reflection, and holistic learning that integrates mind, body, and spirit.
Hooks critiques traditional education for focusing on authority and control rather than empowerment. She calls for engaged pedagogy, where teachers and students learn from each other in an open, participatory environment. She stresses that teachers must also be self-aware and willing to be vulnerable, creating a classroom where students feel heard and valued. As she argues, education should be transformative, resisting systems of domination and helping students develop critical consciousness to shape their own futures.


A Revolution of Values: The Promise of Multicultural Change

Bell Hooks reflects on her high school reunion as a moment that brought back memories of growing up in a racially segregated society and her early attempts at resisting injustice. As a teenager, she was part of a small interracial group committed to racial justice, including her rare friendship with a white classmate, Ken, whose family supported equality. Looking back, she realizes their efforts, though meaningful, were not as radical as they once felt. This leads her to a deeper understanding of how few white individuals truly commit to anti-racist action beyond symbolic support.
Hooks uses these reflections to argue for a broader "revolution of values", calling for a society rooted in justice, equality, and authentic human connection rather than materialism and power. She critiques the education system for upholding oppressive structures and insists that true education must encourage critical thinking, cultural diversity, and open dialogue. Despite resistance to these changes, she draws inspiration from Martin Luther King Jr., urging courage and persistence in the pursuit of a more just and liberated society.


Embracing Change: Teaching in a Multicultural World

Bell Hooks argues that despite widespread talk of multiculturalism in education, there is little practical guidance on creating truly inclusive classrooms. Most teachers, trained in systems that present a dominant worldview as universal, struggle to embrace diverse perspectives and often fear losing control when multiple viewpoints are introduced. Few spaces exist for them to reflect on these challenges or learn new teaching approaches. Hooks recalls organizing seminars at Oberlin College with Chandra Mohanty, where they found that many educators resisted acknowledging how race, gender, and politics influence their teaching, often preferring superficial inclusion over genuine engagement.
She emphasizes that real transformation in the classroom requires fostering critical thinking, open dialogue, and shared responsibility for learning. Educators must let go of rigid authority and create spaces where students can engage with unfamiliar or uncomfortable ideas. For Hooks, multicultural education is not about token inclusion but about rethinking deeply held assumptions and embracing a more liberating, participatory approach to learning that values diverse voices and encourages genuine curiosity.


Paulo Freire

Bell Hooks reflects on the profound influence Paulo Freire had on her thinking, framing the dialogue between her personal self, Gloria Watkins, and her writing voice, bell hooks. Freire's work gave her the language to understand and articulate the intersecting oppressions of racism, sexism, and colonialism. Unlike many academic readers, she formed a personal connection to his ideas, particularly his concept of conscientization, the awakening to systems of oppression, and the call to combine thought with action. While she critiques the sexist language in his early work, she insists on a balanced reading that honors his insights while pushing for feminist inclusion.
Hooks recalls meeting Freire and how he welcomed feminist critique rather than resisting it, embodying the openness he advocated. She found their exchange deeply inspiring, a moment of solidarity that renewed her commitment to education as a liberatory practice. Though she cited him less in later works, Freire's ideas remained central to her worldview. His belief in living and teaching with passion continued to shape her intellectual and activist journey, making him a lasting source of wisdom and inspiration.


Theory as Liberatory Practice

Bell Hooks shares that she turned to theory during a time of deep emotional pain. As a child, she often questioned authority and unfair rules but was punished instead of being heard, leaving her feeling isolated and disconnected. Over time, she found comfort in critical thinking, using theory as a way to understand her struggles and imagine a better world. For Hooks, theory became a tool for healing, not just intellectual exploration.
She argues that theory must stay grounded in real-life experiences to be truly transformative. Too often, academic theory, especially feminist theory, becomes disconnected, inaccessible, and dismissive of marginalized voices. Hooks warns against both elitist complexity and total rejection of theory, insisting that meaningful social change requires both understanding and action. She calls for feminist theory that speaks to everyone, especially those directly affected by sexism and racism, and believes that when theory resonates with people’s lived experiences, it naturally inspires healing, empowerment, and change.


Essentialism and Experience

Bell Hooks critiques the way some feminist scholars, particularly white feminists, have undervalued the contributions of Black women by selectively citing only a few voices and ignoring the broader body of work. She specifically engages with Diana Fuss's Essentially Speaking, appreciating some of its insights on essentialism but criticizing Fuss for dismissing Black feminist critics without meaningful engagement. Hooks points out that this pattern reinforces racial and gender hierarchies in academia, especially when Black male scholars receive more attention than Black women.
In discussing how essentialism appears in the classroom, Hooks challenges Fuss's claim that marginalized students use the experience to dominate discussions, noting that privileged students also assert authority, often more subtly. Hooks argues for a classroom that values experience alongside analysis, encouraging students to share stories that deepen understanding rather than shut it down. She emphasizes that memory, suffering, and lived experience add richness to learning and are crucial for connecting theory to real life. Ultimately, she advocates for education that embraces diverse perspectives and builds knowledge through both critical thinking and personal insight.


Holding My Sister's Hand: Feminist Solidarity

Bell Hooks explores the deep-rooted impact of racism on relationships between Black and white women, shaped by power imbalances in a patriarchal and white supremacist society. While interracial relationships between Black men and white women were often celebrated as progress, they didn't challenge the core structures of racism. In contrast, the more common relationships between Black and white women, often structured around servitude, were ignored. White women, including those who were poor, reinforced racial hierarchies to maintain a sense of superiority, even as they relied on Black women for domestic labor. These dynamics continued after slavery through segregation and negative stereotyping, preventing genuine friendships or solidarity.
Hooks argues that the legacy of these historical divisions still affects feminist movements today. Many Black women view white feminists with distrust, as their experiences of racism have often been dismissed or ignored. White feminists, she notes, frequently study race without confronting their own whiteness or power, turning Black women into subjects rather than collaborators. This dynamic mirrors old patterns of dominance. Still, Hooks urges against abandoning feminism; instead, she calls for honest, sometimes uncomfortable conversations between Black and white women to foster real solidarity. Only by addressing past and present injustices can feminism become a truly inclusive and transformative movement.


Feminist Thinking: In the Classroom Right Now

Bell Hooks reflects on how teaching feminist studies has evolved, particularly in increasingly diverse classrooms. While early women's studies classes were mostly white and pro-feminist, today's students come from varied racial, gender, and national backgrounds, often questioning whether feminism is relevant to them. Many Black students feel alienated when feminism is taught without addressing race, or when they are unfamiliar with key figures like Audre Lorde. White students may resist connecting feminism to racism, further isolating their peers. Hooks, committed to both Black liberation and feminism, argues that addressing gender is essential to fighting racism, but recognizes that teaching these ideas can be tense and complex, especially when Black men focus solely on racism and are unaware of how sexism shapes their lives.
To create a more inclusive space, Hooks formed a private reading group for ten Black women, who initially feared how feminism might affect their relationships with Black men. Over time, they found feminism empowering and necessary for improving Black communities, recognizing that Black women's insight into both racism and sexism gives them a unique power to drive change. Though they feared backlash, they understood that critical awareness was transformative. Studying Audre Lorde's "Eye to Eye" helped them see that feminism requires honesty and action, not just theory. Hooks concludes that feminism and racial justice are deeply connected, and teaching feminism effectively in diverse classrooms means developing new, inclusive approaches that speak to all students' lived realities.


Feminist Scholarship: Black Scholars

Bell Hooks reflects on her journey as a Black feminist scholar, beginning with her experiences of gender inequality in a male-dominated Black household and continuing through her time at a predominantly white university, where both race and gender were often misunderstood or ignored. Feminist studies largely centered on white women, while Black studies often treated Black men's experiences as universal. Finding little written about Black women's lives, Hooks was inspired to write Ain't I a Woman. However, early on, publishers dismissed race as irrelevant to feminism, only showing interest when white women began engaging with the topic. Meanwhile, pioneering Black feminists like Toni Cade Bambara and Angela Davis received little support from white feminists, and many in Black communities rejected feminism as irrelevant or even harmful.
This left Black feminist scholars isolated, caught between white feminists who avoided race and Black communities that denied sexism. Much of their energy went into justifying the existence of racism and sexism, slowing the development of their own theories. Although Black feminists eventually reshaped feminist discourse to include race and class, this did not lead to increased institutional support for Black feminist work. Today, more white women than Black women write about race and feminism, while many Black female scholars avoid labeling their work as feminist due to career risks and strained ties with Black male colleagues. Still, progress has been made, especially in literary studies. Writers like Alice Walker helped spark gender discussions in Black communities. Yet, Black feminist scholarship remains marginalized, and Hooks urges Black scholars to continue speaking out, asserting that without their voices, vital conversations about race, gender, and power will remain incomplete.


Building a Teaching Community: A Dialogue

Bell Hooks and Ron Scapp explore how to create liberatory classrooms that break away from traditional hierarchies in education. Drawing on Scapp's background in philosophy and urban education, they emphasize the power of dialogue, where teachers and students learn from one another rather than maintaining a top-down dynamic. They critique the professor-as-authority model and argue for teaching that centers students' voices and lived experiences. For them, education should not simply deliver content but transform how students think, encouraging critical engagement with the world.
They also highlight how emotion plays a vital role in learning, challenging academia's tendency to separate feeling from intellect. Educators, they argue, must be willing to reflect, take risks, and let go of rigid authority to foster true engagement. However, they acknowledge real barriers, like institutional resistance, large class sizes, and pressure to conform, that make progressive teaching difficult. Hooks and Scapp call for more flexibility and movement across institutions to avoid getting stuck in outdated methods. At its core, their vision is of education as a shared, liberating journey for both students and teachers.


Language: Teaching New Worlds / New Words

Bell Hooks explores the dual nature of language as both a tool of oppression and a means of resistance. Inspired by Adrienne Rich's line, "This is the oppressor's language, yet I need it to talk to you", Hooks reflects on how language shapes our experiences, often beyond our control. Enslaved Africans were stripped of their native tongues and forced to speak English, but they transformed it into the Black vernacular, a powerful form of expression rooted in survival, resistance, and cultural identity.
Hooks argues that even today, standard English is used to silence marginalized voices, especially in schools and academic spaces that reject non-standard dialects. She insists that Black vernacular and other diverse forms of speech are not errors but rich expressions of identity. Language determines who is heard and whose voice is valued, so she calls for classrooms and communities to embrace multiple ways of speaking. For Hooks, reclaiming language is essential to liberation, allowing people to resist domination and build spaces of inclusion and solidarity.


Confronting Class in the Classroom

Bell Hooks highlights how class differences are rarely discussed in US education, where the myth of equal opportunity dominates. Growing up working-class, she faced immediate challenges at Stanford, worrying about money for books and travel, but she soon realized the class wasn't just about income. It also shaped behavior, values, and social norms. In college, wealthier students set unspoken standards for how to act in class, quiet, emotionally restrained, and deferential to authority, while working-class students had to adjust their speech and presence to fit in. Even in progressive spaces that addressed race and gender, class was often ignored, and Hooks found that speaking about working-class struggles made others uncomfortable.
These unspoken class norms deeply affect learning environments. Wealthier students may expect calm, orderly discussion, while working-class students often see passionate debate as engagement, leading to misunderstandings and tension. To succeed, many working-class students feel pressured to hide or shed parts of their identity, causing stress and a sense of not fully belonging anywhere. Hooks argues that education must confront class more openly by creating inclusive classrooms, valuing diverse ways of speaking, and supporting students in embracing both their academic and personal backgrounds. True learning, she insists, should empower students without asking them to erase who they are.


Eros, Eroticism, and the Pedgagogical Process

Bell Hooks critiques the way traditional education separates mind from body, ignoring passion, emotion, and physical presence in the classroom. She recalls realizing early in her teaching career that she, too, had repressed her emotions, treating a student harshly because she couldn't acknowledge her own attraction. This experience helped her see that passion is always present in learning, even if unspoken. Feminist teaching later showed her that education can and should engage the whole self, mind, body, and emotions. She argues that passion isn't just about sexuality; it's about deep curiosity, connection, and transformation. When students feel emotionally engaged, learning becomes meaningful and life-changing.
Hooks shares how one student, after classroom discussions on race and identity, stopped straightening her hair, which is a personal decision sparked by deep reflection and growth. For Hooks, this kind of change shows that real learning transforms lives, not just intellects. Yet, universities often discourage passionate teaching, prioritizing research over relationships. Professors who show care or emotional investment may be seen as unprofessional. Hooks pushes back against this, insisting that love, care, and community should be central to education. When teachers reconnect with their passion and create inclusive, emotionally engaged classrooms, learning becomes a shared, transformative journey.


Ecstasy: Teaching and Learning Without Limits

Bell Hooks recalls breaking her wrist while rushing to meet students, an experience that made her reflect on how often she had pushed herself too hard, both as a child overcoming fear and as a teacher, driven by students' need for support. In the face of a student helping her, she saw the deep importance of mentorship. Hooks believes critical thinking is vital to feminism and social change, yet schools often discourage it, favoring the "banking model" where students passively receive knowledge. Her engaged pedagogy approach emphasizes dialogue, mutual learning, and emotional investment, but it's demanding and often undervalued in academia.
Despite the exhaustion, Hooks finds joy in teaching that transforms students' lives. Though emotionally taxing and sometimes met with resistance, her classes push students to question assumptions and discover their true passions. Many return years later to thank her for reshaping how they see the world. For Hooks, education is not neutral; it's political, liberatory, and deeply human. The classroom, while imperfect, can be a space where freedom is imagined and nurtured through connection, critical thought, and care.